🔗 Share this article

The real-life crime genre has a new medium, or perhaps even a whole new language and grammar: officer-worn camera recordings. Faces of victims, observers and possible perpetrators loom up to the cameras, at times in the intense brightness of vehicle beams or torches as the police arrive, their expressions and tones eloquent of caution or panic or indignation or suspiciously contrived innocence. And we often catch sight of the expressions of the law enforcement personnel, one waiting impassively while the other asks the questions with what occasionally seems like remarkable hesitation – though maybe this is because they are aware they are being recorded.

An Emerging Pattern in Documentary Filmmaking

We have already had the Netflix true-crime documentary The Gabby Petito Case, about the killing of an Instagram influencer by her partner, whose primary focus was body cam footage and in which, as in this film, the police seemed extraordinarily lax with the perpetrator. There is also Bill Morrison’s Oscar-nominated short Incident, composed entirely of officer footage. Now comes Geeta Gandbhir’s documentary about the grim case of Ajike Owens in Ocala, Florida, a woman of colour whose children reportedly bothered and tormented her neighbor, Susan Lorincz. In 2023, after an escalating series of neighbour-dispute incidents in which the police were summoned multiple times, the accused fatally shot Owens through her closed front door, when the victim went to Lorincz’s house to address her about throwing objects at her children.

The Police Inquiry and State Laws

The investigating authorities found proof that the suspect had done internet searches into the state's self-defense statutes, which allow householders and others to use firearms if there is a significant presumption of threat. The movie constructs its narrative with the officer recordings generated during the repeated police visits to the scene before the shooting, and then at the horrific and chaotic crime scene itself – introduced by emergency call recordings of Lorincz contacting authorities in a dramatically trembling voice. There is also jail video of Lorincz which has a disturbing, unsettling appeal.

Portrayal of the Accused

The documentary does not really imply anything too complex about the neighbor, or any extenuating circumstance. She is obviously disturbed, although the children are heard calling her a derogatory term, an hurtful taunt. The film is showcased as an illustration of how “stand your ground” laws lead to unnecessary and heartbreaking violence. But the fact of firearm possession and the second amendment (that longstanding U.S. legal right that a deceased pundit famously claimed made firearm fatalities a necessary cost) is not much highlighted.

Officer Questioning and Firearm Norms

It is possible to watch the officer questioning segments here and feel astonished at how little interest the police took in this point. At what time did she purchase the firearm? Where (if anywhere) did she train in its use? Had she ever had occasion to fire it before? Where did she store it in the house? Could it have been easily accessible and prepared? The authorities aren’t shown asking any of these surely relevant questions (though they could have inquired in recordings that were not included). Or is possessing a firearm so commonplace it would be like asking about kitchen appliances or toasters?

Arrest and Aftermath

For what seemed to her neighbors a very long time, the suspect was not even arrested and charged, only detained and even offered a hotel stay away from home for the night (another point of comparison, by the way, with the Gabby Petito case). And when she was ultimately formally arrested in the detention area, there is an extraordinary sequence in which the individual simply declines to rise, refuses to put her wrists out for the handcuffs, not hostilely, but with the politely self-pitying air of someone whose mental health means that she is unable to comply. Did the gentle handling up until that point led her to think that this could be effective?

Final Outcome and Judgment

It was not successful; and the jury’s verdict is revealed in the closing credits. A deeply sobering picture of U.S. justice and consequences.